ANTI-AI ARCHIVE
RESEARCH GUIDE

Creative labour, consent & AI rights: voice, performance and contracts

ANTI-AI ARCHIVE · LUOCAO / CHEN HAOHAO

Revised 2026-09-22

AI disputes in creative labour concern particular voices, likenesses, performances and conditions of use. A starting point is to ask what a permission covers, who decides, how compensation works and whether workers can bargain. This guide places collective agreements, public hearings and a judicial case alongside one another, preserving differences between places, industries and legal relationships.

RELATED SOURCE IMAGE
Public hearing on AI regulation in dubbing at Brazil’s Chamber of Deputies, 29 August 2024. Photograph by Bruno Spada.View full image ↗

Public hearing on AI regulation in dubbing at Brazil’s Chamber of Deputies, 29 August 2024. Photograph by Bruno Spada.

Bruno Spada / Câmara dos Deputados

Source · Dubbing workers call for protection against unauthorised AI voice use ↗
Digital replicas and synthetic performers: what needs to be distinguished? ↗

Replicating a voice or likeness, using an existing performance for model training, and producing a synthetic performer are different activities.

From strike to agreement: distinguish announcement, ratification and implementation ↗

The 2023 screen strike and the 2024–2025 video-game performers’ strike concern separate contract negotiations.

Public hearings and a voice-rights case: different institutional routes ↗

The Brazilian Dublagem Viva records connect dubbing workers’ demands, delivery of a manifesto and a congressional hearing.

How can consent, compensation and control be researched? ↗

Ask of each source: which use does consent cover, and are training and outputs distinguished?

Related cases & evidence

These cases provide material for comparison and verification; no single source substantiates every claim in the guide.

CASE-0024

SAG-AFTRA / 2023 screen strike and digital replicas ↗

This case contains three dated events; see the timeline. Original documents, parties’ responses, and subsequent developments are still being collected.

RELATED SOURCE IMAGE
Striking actors and writers in Los Angeles on 17 July 2023. This photograph documents the strike, not the November agreement.View full image ↗

Striking actors and writers in Los Angeles on 17 July 2023. This photograph documents the strike, not the November agreement.

Photograph: Benoît Prieur; Wikimedia Commons; CC0 1.0

Source · Striking actors and writers in LA, July 2023 ↗
Read the case, chronology & documents ↗
CASE-0006

SAG-AFTRA / Video-game performers’ labour dispute ↗

Collected events and documents are linked in the timeline; the case history remains under research.

RELATED SOURCE IMAGE
SAG-AFTRA video game performers’ strike graphic, July 2024, preserved in contemporaneous coverage by 2x2.media.View full image ↗

SAG-AFTRA video game performers’ strike graphic, July 2024, preserved in contemporaneous coverage by 2x2.media.

SAG-AFTRA; reproduction source: 2x2.media

Source · SAG-AFTRA begins a strike against video game companies ↗
Read the case, chronology & documents ↗
CASE-0008

Brazil’s Dublagem Viva / Dubbing and AI regulation ↗

Collected events and documents are linked in the timeline; the case history remains under research.

RELATED SOURCE IMAGE
Public hearing on AI regulation in dubbing at Brazil’s Chamber of Deputies, 29 August 2024. Photograph by Bruno Spada.View full image ↗

Public hearing on AI regulation in dubbing at Brazil’s Chamber of Deputies, 29 August 2024. Photograph by Bruno Spada.

Bruno Spada / Câmara dos Deputados

Source · Dubbing workers call for protection against unauthorised AI voice use ↗
Read the case, chronology & documents ↗
CASE-0012

Beijing AI-generated voice / Voice actor’s personality-rights case ↗

Collected events and documents are linked in the timeline; the case history remains under research.

RELATED SOURCE IMAGE
Image published with “Beijing Internet Court issues first-instance judgment in AI-generated voice personality-rights case”. Its creation date is not inferred from the event date in this record.View full image ↗

Image published with “Beijing Internet Court issues first-instance judgment in AI-generated voice personality-rights case”. Its creation date is not inferred from the event date in this record.

Image source: Beijing High People’s Court, Jingfa Wangshi; supplied by Beijing Internet Court and published through The Paper’s government channel; rights remain with the original rights holders.

Source · Beijing Internet Court issues first-instance judgment in AI-generated voice personality-rights case ↗
Read the case, chronology & documents ↗

Original sources

SRC-0016
Beijing Internet Court issues first-instance judgment in AI-generated voice personality-rights case ↗

Beijing High People’s Court, Jingfa Wangshi; supplied by Beijing Internet Court and published through The Paper’s government channel · ZH

Read original source ↗

This research guide is written by the archive. Its Chinese and English texts may include AI-assisted translations and may not yet have received independent human review. Check historical claims and rights information against the original-language sources.

Citation & methodology

This topic is a selection and reading path, not an exhaustive history. Cite the relevant record and original source for specific claims. To cite this guide, give its title, URL and access date.

ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. Creative labour, consent & AI rights: voice, performance and contracts. https://salondesrefuses.cn/en/topics/creative-labour-ai-rights/guides/overview

Methodology & citation ↗

Continue reading

Digital replicas and synthetic performers: what needs to be distinguished? ↗From strike to agreement: distinguish announcement, ratification and implementation ↗Public hearings and a voice-rights case: different institutional routes ↗How can consent, compensation and control be researched? ↗Further reading, sources & citation ↗Return to the selected card ↗Explore the full event chronology ↗