The Brazilian Dublagem Viva records connect dubbing workers’ demands, delivery of a manifesto and a congressional hearing. The Beijing AI-generated voice case records a first-instance decision through judicial information materials. Public discussion is not completed legislation, and a first-instance case is not a universal rule. Comparison should preserve the demands, procedures, scope of the decision and unresolved follow-up in each record.
View full image ↗First page of the official transcript of Brazil’s 29 August 2024 hearing on dubbing and AI regulation.
Câmara dos Deputados; official document
Source · Chamber of Deputies hearing transcript, 29 August 2024 ↗Related cases & evidence
These cases provide material for comparison and verification; no single source substantiates every claim in the guide.
Brazil’s Dublagem Viva / Dubbing and AI regulation ↗
Collected events and documents are linked in the timeline; the case history remains under research.
View full image ↗Public hearing on AI regulation in dubbing at Brazil’s Chamber of Deputies, 29 August 2024. Photograph by Bruno Spada.
Bruno Spada / Câmara dos Deputados
Source · Dubbing workers call for protection against unauthorised AI voice use ↗Beijing AI-generated voice / Voice actor’s personality-rights case ↗
Collected events and documents are linked in the timeline; the case history remains under research.
View full image ↗Image published with “Beijing Internet Court issues first-instance judgment in AI-generated voice personality-rights case”. Its creation date is not inferred from the event date in this record.
Image source: Beijing High People’s Court, Jingfa Wangshi; supplied by Beijing Internet Court and published through The Paper’s government channel; rights remain with the original rights holders.
Source · Beijing Internet Court issues first-instance judgment in AI-generated voice personality-rights case ↗Original sources
Câmara dos Deputados · PT
Read original source ↗Câmara dos Deputados · PT
Read original source ↗Beijing High People’s Court, Jingfa Wangshi; supplied by Beijing Internet Court and published through The Paper’s government channel · ZH
Read original source ↗This research guide is written by the archive. Its Chinese and English texts may include AI-assisted translations and may not yet have received independent human review. Check historical claims and rights information against the original-language sources.
Citation & methodology
This topic is a selection and reading path, not an exhaustive history. Cite the relevant record and original source for specific claims. To cite this guide, give its title, URL and access date.
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. Public hearings and a voice-rights case: different institutional routes. https://salondesrefuses.cn/en/topics/creative-labour-ai-rights/guides/institutions
Methodology & citation ↗