The archive provides Chinese and English research texts. Translations may be AI-assisted and may not yet have received independent human review. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Collected events and documents are linked in the timeline; the case history remains under research.
View full image ↗Image published with “Beijing Internet Court issues first-instance judgment in AI-generated voice personality-rights case”. Its creation date is not inferred from the event date in this record.
Image source: Beijing High People’s Court, Jingfa Wangshi; supplied by Beijing Internet Court and published through The Paper’s government channel; rights remain with the original rights holders.
Source · Beijing Internet Court issues first-instance judgment in AI-generated voice personality-rights case ↗The start date is only the earliest event collected in this batch; it does not assert that the controversy began that day.
Case chronology
Beijing Internet Court rules in an AI-generated voice personality-rights case
According to a judicial information notice, Beijing Internet Court’s first-instance ruling found that an identifiable natural person’s voice rights could extend to the AI voice at issue.
Research question
Retains actors’ positions and specific historical materials for comparison across cases.
Sources
Beijing High People’s Court, Jingfa Wangshi; supplied by Beijing Internet Court and published through The Paper’s government channel · ZH · 2024-04-23
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Beijing AI-generated voice / Voice actor’s personality-rights case.” case-0012. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.