ANTI-AI ARCHIVE
EVENTS / EVT-0017

Beijing Internet Court rules in an AI-generated voice personality-rights case

The archive provides Chinese and English research texts. Translations may be AI-assisted and may not yet have received independent human review. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.

According to a judicial information notice, Beijing Internet Court’s first-instance ruling found that an identifiable natural person’s voice rights could extend to the AI voice at issue.

RELATED SOURCE IMAGE
Image published with “Beijing Internet Court issues first-instance judgment in AI-generated voice personality-rights case”. Its creation date is not inferred from the event date in this record.View full image ↗

Image published with “Beijing Internet Court issues first-instance judgment in AI-generated voice personality-rights case”. Its creation date is not inferred from the event date in this record.

Image source: Beijing High People’s Court, Jingfa Wangshi; supplied by Beijing Internet Court and published through The Paper’s government channel; rights remain with the original rights holders.

Source · Beijing Internet Court issues first-instance judgment in AI-generated voice personality-rights case ↗
Sources read · Research in progress

What changed

In this case, the voice actor’s rights extend to an identifiable voice processed through AI.

RESEARCH NOTE

Do not generalise this case into a finding that every synthetic voice infringes rights. The full judgment remains to be collected. The notice was published during the appeal period, before the first-instance judgment took effect; no later status is inferred here.

Editorial research question

Research question: how does this material connect artistic practice, forms of action and institutional responses?

This is an editorial interpretation or question, separate from factual statements.

Evidence & sources

01

According to a judicial information notice, Beijing Internet Court’s first-instance ruling found that an identifiable natural person’s voice rights could extend to the AI voice at issue.

SRC-0016

Opening account of the ruling date, case facts and court findings

SRC-0016
Beijing Internet Court issues first-instance judgment in AI-generated voice personality-rights case

Beijing High People’s Court, Jingfa Wangshi; supplied by Beijing Internet Court and published through The Paper’s government channel · ZH · 2024-04-23

Case

Cite this record

ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Beijing Internet Court rules in an AI-generated voice personality-rights case.” evt-0017. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.