Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Schmidt and Meir report sending an open letter to the leadership of SIAM, AMS and NSF-MPS, later expanded into an article.
What changed
Schmidt and Meir report sending an open letter to the leadership of SIAM, AMS and NSF-MPS, later expanded into an article.
Retrospective author account; original letter and delivery unverified. The expanded article seeks disclosure and opposes generative-AI peer review while accepting checked assistance. Its exact wording cannot be backdated to the letter or treated as adopted policy.
Editorial research question
Editorial interpretation: Examines verification and reviewing labor in mathematicians’ governance demands.
This is an editorial interpretation or question, separate from factual statements.
Evidence & sources
Schmidt and Meir report sending an open letter to the leadership of SIAM, AMS and NSF-MPS, later expanded into an article.
SRC-0378HTML version information and article lines 30–219; especially 75–80, 146–159 and 165–190.
Material relevant to this case; see the locator for the precise scope read.
SRC-0379Abstract, comments and submission history, lines 8–28.
Paul G. Schmidt / Amnon J. Meir; arXiv · EN · Date unknown
Case
Related documents
DOC-0366Using Generative AI for Literature Searches and Scholarly Writing: Is the Integrity of the Scientific Discourse in Jeopardy?DOC-0367Using Generative AI for Literature Searches and Scholarly Writing: Is the Integrity of the Scientific Discourse in Jeopardy? — abstract and submission historyCite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Authors report sending an open letter.” evt-0319. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.