ANTI-AI ARCHIVE
中文English
Chronology/EVT-0319
EVENTS / EVT-0319

Authors report sending an open letter

The archive provides Chinese and English research texts. Translations may be AI-assisted and may not yet have received independent human review. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.

Schmidt and Meir report sending an open letter to the leadership of SIAM, AMS and NSF-MPS, later expanded into an article.

SOURCE DOCUMENT PAGE
Opening page of the source document associated with “Using Generative AI for Literature Searches and Scholarly Writing: Is the Integrity of the Scientific Discourse in Jeopardy?”. Original page layout retained; follow the source for the full text.View full image ↗

Opening page of the source document associated with “Using Generative AI for Literature Searches and Scholarly Writing: Is the Integrity of the Scientific Discourse in Jeopardy?”. Original page layout retained; follow the source for the full text.

Image source: Paul G. Schmidt / Amnon J. Meir; arXiv; rights remain with the original rights holders.

Source · Using Generative AI for Literature Searches and Scholarly Writing: Is the Integrity of the Scientific Discourse in Jeopardy? ↗
Sources read · Research in progress

What changed

Schmidt and Meir report sending an open letter to the leadership of SIAM, AMS and NSF-MPS, later expanded into an article.

RESEARCH NOTE

Retrospective author account; original letter and delivery unverified. The expanded article seeks disclosure and opposes generative-AI peer review while accepting checked assistance. Its exact wording cannot be backdated to the letter or treated as adopted policy.

Editorial research question

Editorial interpretation: Examines verification and reviewing labour in mathematicians’ governance demands.

This is an editorial interpretation or question, separate from factual statements.

Evidence & sources

01

Schmidt and Meir report sending an open letter to the leadership of SIAM, AMS and NSF-MPS, later expanded into an article.

SRC-0378

HTML version information and article lines 30–219; especially 75–80, 146–159 and 165–190.

02

Material relevant to this case; see the locator for the precise scope read.

SRC-0379

Abstract, comments and submission history, lines 8–28.

Case

CASE-0186AI integrity in mathematical publishing

Related documents

DOC-0366Using Generative AI for Literature Searches and Scholarly Writing: Is the Integrity of the Scientific Discourse in Jeopardy?DOC-0367Using Generative AI for Literature Searches and Scholarly Writing: Is the Integrity of the Scientific Discourse in Jeopardy? — abstract and submission history

Cite this record

ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Authors report sending an open letter.” evt-0319. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.