ANTI-AI ARCHIVESALON DES REFUSÉS
DOCUMENTS / DOC-0367

Using Generative AI for Literature Searches and Scholarly Writing: Is the Integrity of the Scientific Discourse in Jeopardy? — abstract and submission history

Original title: Using Generative AI for Literature Searches and Scholarly Writing: Is the Integrity of the Scientific Discourse in Jeopardy? — abstract and submission history

Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.

Source metadata and links checked; this does not mean the original was saved.

Catalogue record & links

Material description

Page displays submission on 7 October 2023; 2311 in the identifier does not justify changing it. The 1 June letter date comes from author comments. Original letter, delivery receipt and historical webpage snapshot not obtained.

RESEARCH NOTE

This page provides metadata and source links. It does not imply possession of a full copy or permission to reproduce the work.

Sources & original material

Related events

Authors report sending an open letter

Schmidt and Meir report sending an open letter to the leadership of SIAM, AMS and NSF-MPS, later expanded into an article.

United StatesMathematics / Knowledge production and academic labourEVT-0319

Related cases

Cite this record

ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Using Generative AI for Literature Searches and Scholarly Writing: Is the Integrity of the Scientific Discourse in Jeopardy? — abstract and submission history.” doc-0367. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.