The archive provides Chinese and English research texts. Translations may be AI-assisted and may not yet have received independent human review. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Source metadata and links checked; this does not mean the original was saved.
View full image ↗Opening page of the source document associated with “Using Generative AI for Literature Searches and Scholarly Writing: Is the Integrity of the Scientific Discourse in Jeopardy?”. Original page layout retained; follow the source for the full text.
Image source: Paul G. Schmidt / Amnon J. Meir; arXiv; rights remain with the original rights holders.
Source · Using Generative AI for Literature Searches and Scholarly Writing: Is the Integrity of the Scientific Discourse in Jeopardy? ↗Material description
Page displays submission on 7 October 2023; 2311 in the identifier does not justify changing it. The 1 June letter date comes from author comments. Original letter, delivery receipt and historical webpage snapshot not obtained.
This page provides metadata and source links. It does not imply possession of a full copy or permission to reproduce the work.
Sources & original material
Related events
Authors report sending an open letter
Schmidt and Meir report sending an open letter to the leadership of SIAM, AMS and NSF-MPS, later expanded into an article.
Related cases
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Using Generative AI for Literature Searches and Scholarly Writing: Is the Integrity of the Scientific Discourse in Jeopardy? — abstract and submission history.” doc-0367. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.