ANTI-AI ARCHIVESALON DES REFUSÉS
SOURCES / SRC-0379

Using Generative AI for Literature Searches and Scholarly Writing: Is the Integrity of the Scientific Discourse in Jeopardy? — abstract and submission history

Original title: Using Generative AI for Literature Searches and Scholarly Writing: Is the Integrity of the Scientific Discourse in Jeopardy? — abstract and submission history

Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.

arXiv

Read original source (EN)

https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.06981

Reading location

Abstract, comments and submission history, lines 8–28.

RESEARCH NOTE

Page displays submission on 7 October 2023; 2311 in the identifier does not justify changing it. The 1 June letter date comes from author comments. Original letter, delivery receipt and historical webpage snapshot not obtained.

Capture status

No verified capture is recorded. The original page may change; an access date is not a historical version date.

Events citing this source

Authors report sending an open letter

Schmidt and Meir report sending an open letter to the leadership of SIAM, AMS and NSF-MPS, later expanded into an article.

United StatesMathematics / Knowledge production and academic labourEVT-0319

Cite this record

ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Using Generative AI for Literature Searches and Scholarly Writing: Is the Integrity of the Scientific Discourse in Jeopardy? — abstract and submission history.” src-0379. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.