Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Research is ongoing; collected events do not constitute a complete case history.
Dates describe collected records, not the full life of the case.
RESEARCH NOTE
The start date is only the earliest event collected in this batch; it does not assert that the controversy began that day.
Case chronology
Authors report sending an open letter
Schmidt and Meir report sending an open letter to the leadership of SIAM, AMS and NSF-MPS, later expanded into an article.
Research question
Examines verification and reviewing labor in mathematicians’ governance demands.
Related documents
DOC-0366Using Generative AI for Literature Searches and Scholarly Writing: Is the Integrity of the Scientific Discourse in Jeopardy?DOC-0367Using Generative AI for Literature Searches and Scholarly Writing: Is the Integrity of the Scientific Discourse in Jeopardy? — abstract and submission historySources
SRC-0378
Using Generative AI for Literature Searches and Scholarly Writing: Is the Integrity of the Scientific Discourse in Jeopardy?
Paul G. Schmidt / Amnon J. Meir; arXiv · EN · Date unknown
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “AI integrity in mathematical publishing.” case-0186. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.