ANTI-AI ARCHIVESALON DES REFUSÉS
DOCUMENTS / DOC-0366

Using Generative AI for Literature Searches and Scholarly Writing: Is the Integrity of the Scientific Discourse in Jeopardy?

Original title: Using Generative AI for Literature Searches and Scholarly Writing: Is the Integrity of the Scientific Discourse in Jeopardy?

Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.

Source metadata and links checked; this does not mean the original was saved.

Catalogue record & links

Material description

Marked Version of September 1, 2023, not publication date. Final lines 220–282 and full supplementary material not read. Experimental and detector findings are attributed to authors and were not replicated. Not official AMS policy.

RESEARCH NOTE

This page provides metadata and source links. It does not imply possession of a full copy or permission to reproduce the work.

Sources & original material

Related events

Authors report sending an open letter

Schmidt and Meir report sending an open letter to the leadership of SIAM, AMS and NSF-MPS, later expanded into an article.

United StatesMathematics / Knowledge production and academic labourEVT-0319

Related cases

Cite this record

ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Using Generative AI for Literature Searches and Scholarly Writing: Is the Integrity of the Scientific Discourse in Jeopardy?.” doc-0366. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.