The archive provides Chinese and English research texts. Translations may be AI-assisted and may not yet have received independent human review. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Source metadata and links checked; this does not mean the original was saved.
View full image ↗Opening page of the source document associated with “Using Generative AI for Literature Searches and Scholarly Writing: Is the Integrity of the Scientific Discourse in Jeopardy?”. Original page layout retained; follow the source for the full text.
Image source: Paul G. Schmidt / Amnon J. Meir; arXiv; rights remain with the original rights holders.
Source · Using Generative AI for Literature Searches and Scholarly Writing: Is the Integrity of the Scientific Discourse in Jeopardy? ↗Material description
Marked Version of September 1, 2023, not publication date. Final lines 220–282 and full supplementary material not read. Experimental and detector findings are attributed to authors and were not replicated. Not official AMS policy.
This page provides metadata and source links. It does not imply possession of a full copy or permission to reproduce the work.
Sources & original material
Paul G. Schmidt / Amnon J. Meir; arXiv · EN · Date unknown
Related events
Authors report sending an open letter
Schmidt and Meir report sending an open letter to the leadership of SIAM, AMS and NSF-MPS, later expanded into an article.
Related cases
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Using Generative AI for Literature Searches and Scholarly Writing: Is the Integrity of the Scientific Discourse in Jeopardy?.” doc-0366. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.