ANTI-AI ARCHIVESALON DES REFUSÉS
SOURCES / SRC-0378

Using Generative AI for Literature Searches and Scholarly Writing: Is the Integrity of the Scientific Discourse in Jeopardy?

Original title: Using Generative AI for Literature Searches and Scholarly Writing: Is the Integrity of the Scientific Discourse in Jeopardy?

Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.

Paul G. Schmidt / Amnon J. Meir; arXiv

Read original source (EN)

https://arxiv.org/html/2311.06981v1

Reading location

HTML version information and article lines 30–219; especially 75–80, 146–159 and 165–190.

RESEARCH NOTE

Marked Version of September 1, 2023, not publication date. Final lines 220–282 and full supplementary material not read. Experimental and detector findings are attributed to authors and were not replicated. Not official AMS policy.

Capture status

No verified capture is recorded. The original page may change; an access date is not a historical version date.

Events citing this source

Authors report sending an open letter

Schmidt and Meir report sending an open letter to the leadership of SIAM, AMS and NSF-MPS, later expanded into an article.

United StatesMathematics / Knowledge production and academic labourEVT-0319

Cite this record

ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Using Generative AI for Literature Searches and Scholarly Writing: Is the Integrity of the Scientific Discourse in Jeopardy?.” src-0378. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.