Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Research is ongoing; collected events do not constitute a complete case history.
The start date is only the earliest event collected in this batch; it does not assert that the controversy began that day.
Case chronology
ATLF and ATLAS issue a joint statement on AI and literary translation
The associations oppose automation of creative translation, call for disclosure of machine pretranslation and defend translators' creative and contractual choices.
ATLAS page update reiterates demands for human-creation subsidies and training control
The update calls for public subsidies to be reserved for human creation, labelling of AI cultural products and an effective ability to refuse training uses of works.
Research question
translation is explicitly creative labour, not a replaceable service. Resistance connects to disclosure, subsidies, training control and contractual mechanisms.
Related documents
DOC-0328AI and literary translation: translators demand transparencyDOC-0329AI and literary translation: translators demand transparencyDOC-0331Machine translation and post-editing — ATLF survey conducted 20 November–13 December 2022Sources
ATLF / ATLAS · FR · Date unknown
ATLF · FR · Date unknown
Related cases
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “ATLF / ATLAS: opposition to literary translation automation and demands for transparency.” case-0173. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.