Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
ATLF
Read original source (FR)https://atlf.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/ENQUETE-TRADUCTION-AUTOMATIQUE.pdf
Reading location
All 11 pages in extracted text: page 2 overall sample, page 6 denominators, pages 9–11 feedback. Charts not individually visually checked.
476 responses, with missing answers on some questions; over 80% were ATLF members. Questions about post-editing practice had roughly 30–60 answers, versus 392 for the final future-interest question. Denominators cannot be unified or generalised to the industry. Pages 6 and 9 differ at 55/56% and 75/76%; the manifesto's 69% differs from this report's 68%, with version/rounding unresolved. Survey period: 2022-11-20 to 12-13. Publication unknown; 2023/03 in the path is not date evidence.
Capture status
No verified capture is recorded. The original page may change; an access date is not a historical version date.
Events citing this source
No displayed event currently cites this source.
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Machine translation and post-editing — ATLF survey conducted 20 November–13 December 2022.” src-0343. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.