The archive provides Chinese and English research texts. Translations may be AI-assisted and may not yet have received independent human review. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Research is ongoing; collected events do not constitute a complete case history.
View full image ↗Image published with “European translators' responses to generative AI”. Its creation date is not inferred from the event date in this record.
Image source: Dansk Oversætterforbund; rights remain with the original rights holders.
Source · European translators' responses to generative AI ↗The start date is only the earliest event collected in this batch; it does not assert that the controversy began that day.
Case chronology
CEATL member-association AI survey
Dated November 2023, the survey reports 31 association responses: seven issued statements, seventeen co-signed documents, and six negotiated with publishers. Non-recommendation coexists with training.
Norwegian translators endorse CEATL statement
Norsk Oversetterforening announces support for CEATL’s generative-AI literary translation statement, seeking transparency and compensation and opposing public funding for AI-generated literature.
Research question
Association-level evidence distinguishes resistance, cautious use, training and negotiations; it is not a population survey of translators.
Related documents
DOC-0351AI Survey for Member Associations — November 2023DOC-0352European translators' responses to generative AIDOC-0353DOF signs a statement on AIDOC-0354Statement on Artificial IntelligenceDOC-0355Statement on artificial intelligence — French versionDOC-0535Statement on generative AI in literary translationSources
CEATL Working Conditions Working Group · EN · Date unknown
Norsk Oversetterforening · NO · 2023-11-16
Related cases
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “European literary translator associations survey.” case-0179. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.