Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Research is ongoing; collected events do not constitute a complete case history.
The start date is only the earliest event collected in this batch; it does not assert that the controversy began that day.
Case chronology
Zhangjiagang court publishes exemplary-case account of transparent butterfly chair dispute
The Zhangjiagang court published the Feng case, selected among Suzhou courts’ 2025 exemplary cases, with first- and second-instance case numbers. Its summary explains that missing original generation records made personalized intellectual contribution difficult to prove, and that the accused product’s specific expression differed; the plaintiff’s requests were rejected.
Research question
Institutional context involving an AI user’s claimed rights in design images, highlighting proof of creative process and the transition from images to industrial products. This is not an artists’ anti-AI protest.
Related documents
DOC-0200Two cases selected as Suzhou courts’ 2025 exemplary intellectual-property protection casesDOC-0201Simple prompts plus AI generation do not constitute a work: judgment takes effect in reported first such text-to-image caseSources
Zhangjiagang People’s Court official account on The Paper · ZH · 2026-04-22
Legal Daily / Republication by Tibet Cyberspace Administration · ZH · 2025-04-23
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Phantom Wings transparent art chair / Originality and evidence dispute over AI design images.” case-0128. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.