ANTI-AI ARCHIVESALON DES REFUSÉS
SOURCES / SRC-0212

Two cases selected as Suzhou courts’ 2025 exemplary intellectual-property protection cases

Original title: 2篇案例入选2025年度苏州法院知识产权司法保护典型案例

Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.

Zhangjiagang People’s Court official account on The Paper

Read original source (ZH)

https://m.thepaper.cn/newsDetail_forward_33033890

Reading location

Lines 3–9: publisher and date; lines 54–75: Feng case index, facts, reasoning, and brief appeal account.

RESEARCH NOTE

Court-published case summary, not an original judgment. First instance: (2024) Su 0582 Min Chu 9015; appeal: (2025) Su 05 Min Zhong 4840. The summary says the appeal was withdrawn without a specific decision date; 2026 publication is not judgment date.

Capture status

No verified capture is recorded. The original page may change; an access date is not a historical version date.

Events citing this source

Zhangjiagang court publishes exemplary-case account of transparent butterfly chair dispute

The Zhangjiagang court published the Feng case, selected among Suzhou courts’ 2025 exemplary cases, with first- and second-instance case numbers. Its summary explains that missing original generation records made personalized intellectual contribution difficult to prove, and that the accused product’s specific expression differed; the plaintiff’s requests were rejected.

ChinaDesign / Visual artEVT-0213

Cite this record

ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Two cases selected as Suzhou courts’ 2025 exemplary intellectual-property protection cases.” src-0212. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.