Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Research is ongoing; collected events do not constitute a complete case history.
The start date is only the earliest event collected in this batch; it does not assert that the controversy began that day.
Case chronology
Beijing Internet Court presents the crystal cat pendant copyright evidence case
The court's case account states that Zhou did not submit the images' original generation records. Retrospective descriptions and simulations did not establish creative labour at the time of original generation. All claims were dismissed at first instance; the appeal was dismissed and the original judgment upheld.
Research question
institutional context for proving the creative process in AI-assisted design, particularly the evidentiary distinction between retrospective simulations and contemporaneous generation records.
Related documents
DOC-0204AI text-to-image copyright claimed without generation records demonstrating intellectual contribution; court dismisses for insufficient evidenceSources
Beijing Internet Court / republished by Intellectual Property Finance (知产财经) · ZH · 2025-09-16
Related cases
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Crystal cat pendant: generation records and evidence of copyright in AI images.” case-0130. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.