Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Beijing Internet Court / republished by Intellectual Property Finance (知产财经)
Read original source (ZH)https://www.ipeconomy.cn/dongtai/9834.html
Reading location
Lines 23–65: source date, facts of Zhou's case, evidentiary analysis, results at both instances and the judge's explanation.
A republication of the court's case account, not the original judgment. 16 September is publication; neither instance's case number or judgment date is given. The webpage-reading tool returned the body directly; no subscription action or access circumvention was used. Images were not reviewed.
Capture status
No verified capture is recorded. The original page may change; an access date is not a historical version date.
Events citing this source
Beijing Internet Court presents the crystal cat pendant copyright evidence case
The court's case account states that Zhou did not submit the images' original generation records. Retrospective descriptions and simulations did not establish creative labour at the time of original generation. All claims were dismissed at first instance; the appeal was dismissed and the original judgment upheld.
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “AI text-to-image copyright claimed without generation records demonstrating intellectual contribution; court dismisses for insufficient evidence.” src-0216. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.