Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Source metadata and links checked; this does not mean the original was saved.
Material description
Only relevant opening sections read. Failure to pay appeal fees or seek reduction, deferral, or waiver is the procedure reported by news, not a merits affirmance on appeal. Wording differences from the 2026 court summary await the original ruling; an untested nationwide-first claim is not adopted.
This page provides metadata and source links. It does not imply possession of a full copy or permission to reproduce the work.
Sources & original material
Legal Daily / Republication by Tibet Cyberspace Administration · ZH · 2025-04-23
Related events
Zhangjiagang court publishes exemplary-case account of transparent butterfly chair dispute
The Zhangjiagang court published the Feng case, selected among Suzhou courts’ 2025 exemplary cases, with first- and second-instance case numbers. Its summary explains that missing original generation records made personalized intellectual contribution difficult to prove, and that the accused product’s specific expression differed; the plaintiff’s requests were rejected.
Related cases
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Simple prompts plus AI generation do not constitute a work: judgment takes effect in reported first such text-to-image case.” doc-0201. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.