Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
The court affirms dismissal of part of the DMCA action: the pleaded outputs lacking attribution did not establish removal or alteration of information from existing copies. The input theory was forfeited.
An interlocutory appeal, not a blanket fair-use ruling on AI training; the opinion does not impose literal identicality as a separate requirement.
Case chronology
Ninth Circuit affirms dismissal of part of Copilot DMCA action
The court affirms dismissal of part of the DMCA action: the pleaded outputs lacking attribution did not establish removal or alteration of information from existing copies. The input theory was forfeited.
Research question
Editorial interpretation: examines relationships between creative labour, permission and institutional responses in this record.
Related documents
DOC-0410Doe v. GitHub, Inc., No. 24-7700 — OpinionSources
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · EN · 2026-09-16
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Doe v GitHub: code attribution and copyright management information.” case-0204. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.