The archive provides Chinese and English research texts. Translations may be AI-assisted and may not yet have received independent human review. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
The court affirms dismissal of part of the DMCA action: the pleaded outputs lacking attribution did not establish removal or alteration of information from existing copies. The input theory was forfeited.
View full image ↗Opening page of the source document associated with “Doe v. GitHub, Inc., No. 24-7700 — Opinion”. Original page layout retained; follow the source for the full text.
Image source: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; rights remain with the original rights holders.
Source · Doe v. GitHub, Inc., No. 24-7700 — Opinion ↗An interlocutory appeal, not a blanket fair-use ruling on AI training; the opinion does not impose literal identicality as a separate requirement.
Case chronology
Ninth Circuit affirms dismissal of part of Copilot DMCA action
The court affirms dismissal of part of the DMCA action: the pleaded outputs lacking attribution did not establish removal or alteration of information from existing copies. The input theory was forfeited.
Research question
Editorial interpretation: examines relationships between creative labour, permission and institutional responses in this record.
Related documents
DOC-0410Doe v. GitHub, Inc., No. 24-7700 — OpinionSources
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · EN · 2026-09-16
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Doe v GitHub: code attribution and copyright management information.” case-0204. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.