Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Read original source (EN)https://cdn.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2026/09/16/24-7700.pdf
Reading location
Opinion pp.1–4 and 14–18.
An interlocutory appeal, not a blanket fair-use ruling on AI training; the opinion does not impose literal identicality as a separate requirement.
Capture status
No verified capture is recorded. The original page may change; an access date is not a historical version date.
Events citing this source
Ninth Circuit affirms dismissal of part of Copilot DMCA action
The court affirms dismissal of part of the DMCA action: the pleaded outputs lacking attribution did not establish removal or alteration of information from existing copies. The input theory was forfeited.
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Doe v. GitHub, Inc., No. 24-7700 — Opinion.” src-0419. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.