The archive provides Chinese and English research texts. Translations may be AI-assisted and may not yet have received independent human review. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Source metadata and links checked; this does not mean the original was saved.
View full image ↗Opening page of the source document associated with “Doe v. GitHub, Inc., No. 24-7700 — Opinion”. Original page layout retained; follow the source for the full text.
Image source: U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit; rights remain with the original rights holders.
Source · Doe v. GitHub, Inc., No. 24-7700 — Opinion ↗Material description
An interlocutory appeal, not a blanket fair-use ruling on AI training; the opinion does not impose literal identicality as a separate requirement.
This page provides metadata and source links. It does not imply possession of a full copy or permission to reproduce the work.
Sources & original material
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · EN · 2026-09-16
Related events
Ninth Circuit affirms dismissal of part of Copilot DMCA action
The court affirms dismissal of part of the DMCA action: the pleaded outputs lacking attribution did not establish removal or alteration of information from existing copies. The input theory was forfeited.
Related cases
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Doe v. GitHub, Inc., No. 24-7700 — Opinion.” doc-0410. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.