Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York; copy hosted by Music Business Worldwide
Read original source (EN)https://www.musicbusinessworldwide.com/files/2026/09/UMG-reply-AFM.pdf
Reading location
PDF pp.1–5.
Case 1:26-cv-04760-ER, Document 51. Cover, contents and opening argument checked. Defendant arguments are not a judgment; union pleadings require further reading.
Capture status
No verified capture is recorded. The original page may change; an access date is not a historical version date.
Events citing this source
UMG files reply seeking dismissal of AFM new-use payment action
UMG argues that SRLA Article 21(a) imports rates from another applicable agreement and that no AI-use agreement exists. It seeks dismissal and recounts AFM’s competing view that the SRLA itself can supply rates.
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Universal Music Group Reply Memorandum Supporting Motion to Dismiss — Document 51.” src-0435. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.