Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
UMG argues that SRLA Article 21(a) imports rates from another applicable agreement and that no AI-use agreement exists. It seeks dismissal and recounts AFM’s competing view that the SRLA itself can supply rates.
What changed
UMG argues that SRLA Article 21(a) imports rates from another applicable agreement and that no AI-use agreement exists. It seeks dismissal and recounts AFM’s competing view that the SRLA itself can supply rates.
Case 1:26-cv-04760-ER, Document 51. Cover, contents and opening argument checked. Defendant arguments are not a judgment; union pleadings require further reading.
Editorial research question
Editorial interpretation: examines relationships between creative labour, permission and institutional responses in this record.
This is an editorial interpretation or question, separate from factual statements.
Evidence & sources
UMG argues that SRLA Article 21(a) imports rates from another applicable agreement and that no AI-use agreement exists. It seeks dismissal and recounts AFM’s competing view that the SRLA itself can supply rates.
SRC-0435PDF pp.1–5.
U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York; copy hosted by Music Business Worldwide · EN · 2026-09-11
Case
Related documents
DOC-0426Universal Music Group Reply Memorandum Supporting Motion to Dismiss — Document 51Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “UMG files reply seeking dismissal of AFM new-use payment action.” evt-0365. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.