The archive provides Chinese and English research texts. Translations may be AI-assisted and may not yet have received independent human review. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
ADAGP calls for a consent mechanism for visual art in place of opt-out, proposing collective management, equitable compensation and transparency obligations for training and generated content.
What changed
ADAGP calls for a consent mechanism for visual art in place of opt-out, proposing collective management, equitable compensation and transparency obligations for training and generated content.
Read HTML lines 124–188, dated 23 May 2023. The three points are institutional policy demands, not enacted law. Interpretations of law, market substitution and technical capabilities are attributed to ADAGP and not independently verified. The PDF attachment and videos at the page end were not read. Metadata and summaries only; no historical snapshot.
Editorial research question
Editorial interpretation: compares advocacy for changing consent arrangements in 2023 with action using existing opt-out mechanisms in 2024, without assuming policy adoption.
This is an editorial interpretation or question, separate from factual statements.
Evidence & sources
ADAGP calls for a consent mechanism for visual art in place of opt-out, proposing collective management, equitable compensation and transparency obligations for training and generated content.
SRC-0641HTML124–188: consent, remuneration, transparency
Case
Related documents
DOC-0638AI and copyright: ADAGP calls for regulation on three pointsCite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “ADAGP proposes three regulatory measures.” evt-0416. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.