The archive provides Chinese and English research texts. Translations may be AI-assisted and may not yet have received independent human review. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
ADAGP calls for a consent mechanism for visual art in place of opt-out, proposing collective management, equitable compensation and transparency obligations for training and generated content.
Material description
Read HTML lines 124–188, dated 23 May 2023. The three points are institutional policy demands, not enacted law. Interpretations of law, market substitution and technical capabilities are attributed to ADAGP and not independently verified. The PDF attachment and videos at the page end were not read. Metadata and summaries only; no historical snapshot.
This page provides metadata and source links. It does not imply possession of a full copy or permission to reproduce the work.
Sources & original material
Related events
ADAGP proposes three regulatory measures
ADAGP calls for a consent mechanism for visual art in place of opt-out, proposing collective management, equitable compensation and transparency obligations for training and generated content.
Related cases
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “AI and copyright: ADAGP calls for regulation on three points.” doc-0638. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.