ANTI-AI ARCHIVE
CASES / CASE-0239

ADAGP: consent, remuneration and training opt-out in visual art

The archive provides Chinese and English research texts. Translations may be AI-assisted and may not yet have received independent human review. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.

Verified source milestones comprise the 2023 regulatory demands and the 2024 opt-out declaration; contractual implementation and later effects remain to be checked.

Dates describe collected records, not the full life of the case.
RESEARCH NOTE

The start date is only the earliest event collected in this batch; it does not assert that the controversy began that day.

Case chronology

ADAGP proposes three regulatory measures

ADAGP calls for a consent mechanism for visual art in place of opt-out, proposing collective management, equitable compensation and transparency obligations for training and generated content.

FranceVisual artEVT-0416

ADAGP publishes opt-out declaration and protective measures

ADAGP’s French declaration and press release are both dated 23 February 2024. They oppose use of managed works under the data-mining exception and report introducing crawling restrictions, contractual training bans and an artists’ guide.

FranceVisual artEVT-0417

Research question

Compares advocacy for changing consent arrangements in 2023 with action using existing opt-out mechanisms in 2024, without assuming policy adoption.

Related documents

DOC-0635ADAGP takes measures to protect its members against the threat of generative artificial intelligenceDOC-0636ADAGP opposes AI systems’ use of works in its repertoire under the data-mining exceptionDOC-0637ADAGP — Declaration of opposition to text and data mining (XML)DOC-0638AI and copyright: ADAGP calls for regulation on three points

Sources

Cite this record

ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “ADAGP: consent, remuneration and training opt-out in visual art.” case-0239. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.