Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
SCD urges rejection of the proposal, exclusion of artistic repertoire and dialogue with rightsholders, opposing a fund as a substitute for permission and remuneration.
What changed
SCD urges rejection of the proposal, exclusion of artistic repertoire and dialogue with rightsholders, opposing a fund as a substitute for permission and remuneration.
An organisational statement, not a record of a vote or commencement; distinguish the 11 May proposal from the 12 May announcement.
Editorial research question
Editorial interpretation: the music rights organisation argues that a general government fund cannot replace permission, remuneration and participation in decisions; linked to Chilevoces without assuming coordinated action.
This is an editorial interpretation or question, separate from factual statements.
Evidence & sources
SCD urges rejection of the proposal, exclusion of artistic repertoire and dialogue with rightsholders, opposing a fund as a substitute for permission and remuneration.
SRC-0353Lines 135–146: announcement and link to original statement.
Material relevant to this case; see the locator for the precise scope read.
SRC-0354Full text of three pages read, lines 0–78.
SCD · ES · 2026-05-12
SCD · ES · Date unknown
Case
Related documents
DOC-0341SCD rejects the amendment to Article 8 of the Reconstruction Bill: copyright violations remain unchangedDOC-0342SCD rejects the substitute amendment to Article 8 of the Reconstruction Bill: a regulatory expropriation of creators' rightsCite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “SCD opposes a substitute amendment to Article 8 of the Reconstruction Bill.” evt-0305. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.