The archive provides Chinese and English research texts. Translations may be AI-assisted and may not yet have received independent human review. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
SCD
Read original source (ES)https://scd.cl/sitio/wp-content/uploads/2026/05/SCD-RECHAZA-LA-INDICACION-SUSTITUTIVA-AL-ARTICULO-8-DEL-PROYECTO-DE-LEY-DE-RECONSTRUCCION.pdf
Reading location
Full text of three pages read, lines 0–78.
PDF has no publication date and is linked through the 12 May publication page. The 11 May date refers to the opposed amendment. Unconstitutionality and treaty-violation claims are SCD's legal position, not judgments. The fund's relationship to compensation is the organisation's view; original bill and proceedings unverified.
Capture status
No verified capture is recorded. The original page may change; an access date is not a historical version date.
Events citing this source
SCD opposes a substitute amendment to Article 8 of the Reconstruction Bill
SCD urges rejection of the proposal, exclusion of artistic repertoire and dialogue with rightsholders, opposing a fund as a substitute for permission and remuneration.
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “SCD rejects the substitute amendment to Article 8 of the Reconstruction Bill: a regulatory expropriation of creators' rights.” src-0354. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.