Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Source metadata and links checked; this does not mean the original was saved.
Material description
PDF has no publication date and is linked through the 12 May publication page. The 11 May date refers to the opposed amendment. Unconstitutionality and treaty-violation claims are SCD's legal position, not judgments. The fund's relationship to compensation is the organisation's view; original bill and proceedings unverified.
This page provides metadata and source links. It does not imply possession of a full copy or permission to reproduce the work.
Sources & original material
SCD · ES · Date unknown
Related events
SCD opposes a substitute amendment to Article 8 of the Reconstruction Bill
SCD urges rejection of the proposal, exclusion of artistic repertoire and dialogue with rightsholders, opposing a fund as a substitute for permission and remuneration.
Related cases
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “SCD rejects the substitute amendment to Article 8 of the Reconstruction Bill: a regulatory expropriation of creators' rights.” doc-0342. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.