Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
The report quotes ATRAE criticising automatic translation and post-editing for their impact on working conditions and quality, emphasising linguistic diversity and accessibility such as audio description and subtitles for deaf audiences.
What changed
The report quotes ATRAE criticising automatic translation and post-editing for their impact on working conditions and quality, emphasising linguistic diversity and accessibility such as audio description and subtitles for deaf audiences.
Publication of the report, not a confirmed first statement, event or manifesto launch date. Relayed interview remarks are not treated as a press release directly obtained.
Editorial research question
Editorial interpretation: audiovisual translators connect creative judgment, linguistic diversity and accessibility with working conditions, distinct from literary translation or voice synthesis alone.
This is an editorial interpretation or question, separate from factual statements.
Evidence & sources
The report quotes ATRAE criticising automatic translation and post-editing for their impact on working conditions and quality, emphasising linguistic diversity and accessibility such as audio description and subtitles for deaf audiences.
SRC-0309Lines 77–109: date, ATRAE remarks and accessibility demands.
Audiovisual451 · ES · 2025-11-06
Case
Related documents
DOC-0297Audiovisual translators assert the importance of human talent in the face of artificial intelligenceCite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Audiovisual451 reports ATRAE's opposition to AI replacing audiovisual translators.” evt-0274. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.