Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Research is ongoing; collected events do not constitute a complete case history.
The start date is only the earliest event collected in this batch; it does not assert that the controversy began that day.
Case chronology
Audiovisual451 reports ATRAE's opposition to AI replacing audiovisual translators
The report quotes ATRAE criticising automatic translation and post-editing for their impact on working conditions and quality, emphasising linguistic diversity and accessibility such as audio description and subtitles for deaf audiences.
Research question
audiovisual translators connect creative judgment, linguistic diversity and accessibility with working conditions, distinct from literary translation or voice synthesis alone.
Related documents
DOC-0297Audiovisual translators assert the importance of human talent in the face of artificial intelligenceDOC-0298ATRAE manifesto for human translationSources
Audiovisual451 · ES · 2025-11-06
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “ATRAE: human audiovisual translation and opposition to machine-translation post-editing.” case-0162. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.