ANTI-AI ARCHIVESALON DES REFUSÉS
CASES / CASE-0228

IO / Ernst Klett Verlag: objection to AI clauses in illustration contracts

The archive provides Chinese and English research texts. Translations may be AI-assisted and may not yet have received independent human review. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.

IO criticises Ernst Klett Verlag’s reported replacement of its illustration framework agreement with a creative-services base agreement, objecting to AI clauses and expanded editing and usage rights; it calls for revisions and offers dialogue.

Dates describe collected records, not the full life of the case.
RESEARCH NOTE

August 11 dates the IO statement, not contract implementation. Only the web statement was read; detailed PDF, original contract, publisher response and implementation remain unverified. Assessments of expanded rights are attributed to IO, not a court. Verification update of 21 September 2026: detailed PDF now checked, see src-0477.

Case chronology

IO calls for revision of Klett creative-services contract

IO criticises Ernst Klett Verlag’s reported replacement of its illustration framework agreement with a creative-services base agreement, objecting to AI clauses and expanded editing and usage rights; it calls for revisions and offers dialogue.

GermanyIllustration / PublishingEVT-0386

Research question

Professional association connects AI disputes to rights allocation and negotiation in commissioning contracts.

Related documents

DOC-0467Statement on changes to Ernst Klett Verlag’s framework agreementDOC-0468Ernst Klett Verlag — Changes to the “Illustration Framework Agreement”: statement by Illustratoren Organisation e.V.

Sources

Related cases

Cite this record

ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “IO / Ernst Klett Verlag: objection to AI clauses in illustration contracts.” case-0228. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.