The archive provides Chinese and English research texts. Translations may be AI-assisted and may not yet have received independent human review. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
IO describes an asymmetry: restrictions and disclosure duties for illustrators, but publisher rights to AI input, training and development. It recommends renegotiation, explicit consent and separate fair remuneration.
Material description
Four-page PDF has no visible date; linked from the 2026-08-11 page. URL 2020/06 is not a publication date. Full text and four rendered pages checked. IO commentary is not the original contract; publisher response, signatures and actual training remain unverified. German original; AI-assisted bilingual summary pending human review.
This page provides metadata and source links. It does not imply possession of a full copy or permission to reproduce the work.
Sources & original material
Illustratoren Organisation e.V. · DE · Date unknown
Related events
IO calls for revision of Klett creative-services contract
IO criticises Ernst Klett Verlag’s reported replacement of its illustration framework agreement with a creative-services base agreement, objecting to AI clauses and expanded editing and usage rights; it calls for revisions and offers dialogue.
Related cases
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Ernst Klett Verlag — Changes to the “Illustration Framework Agreement”: statement by Illustratoren Organisation e.V..” doc-0468. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.