The archive provides Chinese and English research texts. Translations may be AI-assisted and may not yet have received independent human review. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Research is ongoing; collected events do not constitute a complete case history.
View full image ↗Opening page of the source document associated with “The crisis of AI-generated mathematics — submission record”. Original page layout retained; follow the source for the full text.
Image source: arXiv; rights remain with the original rights holders.
Source · The crisis of AI-generated mathematics — submission record ↗The start date is only the earliest event collected in this batch; it does not assert that the controversy began that day.
Case chronology
Max Weinreich submits an argument against AI-generated mathematics
The abstract explicitly opposes AI use in mathematics and calls for coordinated action by individuals, departments, journals and institutions. The current body emphasises human understanding and scholarly labour developed through writing.
Research question
retain an explicit refusal stronger than conditional adoption, examining the irreplaceability of writing, understanding and research labour without treating it as mathematical consensus.
Related documents
DOC-0280The crisis of AI-generated mathematics — submission recordDOC-0281The crisis of AI-generated mathematics — HTML textDOC-0282The Association for Human Mathematics (AHM)DOC-0283Members — AHM: Membership commitmentSources
Association for Human Mathematics · EN · Date unknown
Related cases
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Mathematics / Max Weinreich: a public argument against AI-generated mathematics.” case-0156. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.