Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
The abstract explicitly opposes AI use in mathematics and calls for coordinated action by individuals, departments, journals and institutions. The current body emphasises human understanding and scholarly labour developed through writing.
What changed
The abstract explicitly opposes AI use in mathematics and calls for coordinated action by individuals, departments, journals and institutions. The current body emphasises human understanding and scholarly labour developed through writing.
The date is arXiv submission. The body is marked updated on 24 August; every current recommendation cannot be backdated to first submission. A position paper is not implemented policy or an independently verified mathematical result.
Editorial research question
Editorial interpretation: retain an explicit refusal stronger than conditional adoption, examining the irreplaceability of writing, understanding and research labour without treating it as mathematical consensus.
This is an editorial interpretation or question, separate from factual statements.
Evidence & sources
The abstract explicitly opposes AI use in mathematics and calls for coordinated action by individuals, departments, journals and institutions. The current body emphasises human understanding and scholarly labour developed through writing.
SRC-0292Lines 8–26: abstract, author and submission history.
Material relevant to this case; see the locator for the precise scope read.
SRC-0293Lines 22–126: abstract, critical argument and some action proposals; text after line 127 was not read in full.
Case
Related documents
DOC-0280The crisis of AI-generated mathematics — submission recordDOC-0281The crisis of AI-generated mathematics — HTML textCite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Max Weinreich submits an argument against AI-generated mathematics.” evt-0265. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.