Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
From 2023 to 2026, SIAM used AI publishing rules and named explanations to defend author responsibility and reviewing labour, permitting conditional use rather than banning AI entirely.
The start date is only the earliest event collected in this batch; it does not assert that the controversy began that day.
Case chronology
SIAM issues an editorial AI policy
SIAM's 2024 retrospective records an AI policy issued in October 2023, allowing uses such as language polishing but requiring disclosure and author responsibility.
SIAM AI Policy 2.0 is marked effective
Current rules require human author responsibility and disclosure. Reviewers may not provide manuscripts under review to generative AI; core reviewing and editorial judgment must remain human.
Tamara G. Kolda discusses AI misuse's harm to reviewing labour and trust
SIAM's vice president for publications criticises fabricated citations, improper authorship and poor submissions for adding verification work while endorsing responsible AI-assisted research. The article states that author-integrity investigations have occurred.
Research question
compare author responsibility, consent to access works and professional judgment that cannot be outsourced in academia and the arts. Conditional use is recorded separately from opposition.
Related documents
DOC-0272Another Robust Year for SIAM PublicationsDOC-0273SIAM Publications – Editorial Policy on Artificial IntelligenceDOC-0274A Contract of Trust: Artificial Intelligence Usage for SIAM Journal SubmissionsSources
SIAM · EN · 2026-05-01
Related cases
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Mathematics / SIAM: AI publishing policy, human responsibility and reviewing labour.” case-0155. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.