Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Current rules require human author responsibility and disclosure. Reviewers may not provide manuscripts under review to generative AI; core reviewing and editorial judgment must remain human.
What changed
Current rules require human author responsibility and disclosure. Reviewers may not provide manuscripts under review to generative AI; core reviewing and editorial judgment must remain human.
The website states effectiveness in May, with no exact day. The exception for editorial manuscript handling requires explicit permission from the vice president for publications and corresponding author; it is not a general reviewer exception. Ordinary grammar checking needs no disclosure. Effectiveness does not establish verified enforcement outcomes.
Editorial research question
Editorial interpretation: compare author responsibility, consent to access works and professional judgment that cannot be outsourced in academia and the arts. Conditional use is recorded separately from opposition.
This is an editorial interpretation or question, separate from factual statements.
Evidence & sources
Current rules require human author responsibility and disclosure. Reviewers may not provide manuscripts under review to generative AI; core reviewing and editorial judgment must remain human.
SRC-0285Lines 34–61: complete current policy body.
Case
Related documents
DOC-0273SIAM Publications – Editorial Policy on Artificial IntelligenceCite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “SIAM AI Policy 2.0 is marked effective.” evt-0261. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.