The archive provides Chinese and English research texts. Translations may be AI-assisted and may not yet have received independent human review. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Research is ongoing; collected events do not constitute a complete case history.
View full image ↗Image published with “Detecting and countering misuse of AI: September 2026”. Its creation date is not inferred from the event date in this record.
Image source: Anthropic; rights remain with the original rights holders.
Source · Detecting and countering misuse of AI: September 2026 ↗The start date is only the earliest event collected in this batch; it does not assert that the controversy began that day.
Case chronology
Anthropic accuses three laboratories of unauthorised distillation
Anthropic alleged that DeepSeek, Moonshot and MiniMax generated over 16 million interactions through approximately 24,000 accounts to extract model capabilities.
Anthropic report expands distillation allegations to seven laboratories
Anthropic extended attribution to Alibaba, Moonshot, DeepSeek, Z.ai, Xiaomi, SenseTime and MiniMax, raising issues of resale, forwarding and training controls over user interactions.
Research question
output-based retraining and permission controls provide an institutional comparison. This is not an artists' lawsuit, and legal equivalence between the disputes is not assumed.
Related documents
DOC-0231Detecting and preventing distillation attacksDOC-0232Detecting and countering misuse of AI: September 2026DOC-0233Threat IntelligenceSources
Related cases
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Anthropic: unauthorised model-distillation allegations and access controls.” case-0142. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.