ANTI-AI ARCHIVESALON DES REFUSÉS
EVENTS / EVT-0236

Anthropic accuses three laboratories of unauthorised distillation

Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.

Anthropic alleged that DeepSeek, Moonshot and MiniMax generated over 16 million interactions through approximately 24,000 accounts to extract model capabilities.

Sources read · Research in progress

What changed

Anthropic alleged that DeepSeek, Moonshot and MiniMax generated over 16 million interactions through approximately 24,000 accounts to extract model capabilities.

RESEARCH NOTE

Numbers, account characteristics and attribution are Anthropic's allegations. The main archive previously had no case for this, so a new case was created; it is not treated as an update to an existing case based on a screenshot.

Editorial research question

Editorial interpretation: output-based retraining and permission controls provide an institutional comparison. This is not an artists' lawsuit, and legal equivalence between the disputes is not assumed.

This is an editorial interpretation or question, separate from factual statements.

Evidence & sources

01

Anthropic alleged that DeepSeek, Moonshot and MiniMax generated over 16 million interactions through approximately 24,000 accounts to extract model capabilities.

SRC-0243

Lines 13–20: allegations concerning three laboratories, roughly 24,000 accounts and 16 million interactions.

SRC-0243

Case

Related documents

DOC-0231Detecting and preventing distillation attacks

Cite this record

ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Anthropic accuses three laboratories of unauthorised distillation.” evt-0236. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.