The archive provides Chinese and English research texts. Translations may be AI-assisted and may not yet have received independent human review. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Research is ongoing; collected events do not constitute a complete case history.
View full image ↗Image published with “Supreme People's Court opinions on adjudicating AI-related disputes in accordance with law”. Its creation date is not inferred from the event date in this record.
Image source: Supreme People's Court; rights remain with the original rights holders.
Source · Supreme People's Court opinions on adjudicating AI-related disputes in accordance with law ↗The start date is only the earliest event collected in this batch; it does not assert that the controversy began that day.
Case chronology
Supreme People's Court issues judicial opinions on AI-related disputes
The Supreme People's Court issued Fa Fa [2026] No. 10, addressing synthetic voices identifying natural persons, liability for generated infringing content, evidence for developers' non-infringement defences and protection of lawful data interests.
Research question
institutional comparison connecting imitation of natural persons' voices, evidence in generated-content infringement and data interests; it does not replace records of artists' actions.
Related documents
DOC-0230Supreme People's Court opinions on adjudicating AI-related disputes in accordance with lawSources
Supreme People's Court · ZH · 2026-09-07
Related cases
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Supreme People's Court: 2026 judicial opinions on AI disputes.” case-0141. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.