The archive provides Chinese and English research texts. Translations may be AI-assisted and may not yet have received independent human review. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Source metadata and links checked; this does not mean the original was saved.
View full image ↗Image published with “Supreme People's Court opinions on adjudicating AI-related disputes in accordance with law”. Its creation date is not inferred from the event date in this record.
Image source: Supreme People's Court; rights remain with the original rights holders.
Source · Supreme People's Court opinions on adjudicating AI-related disputes in accordance with law ↗Material description
Fa Fa [2026] No. 10. Relevant provisions were checked; general judicial opinions are not described as the legal basis of the miHoYo judgment.
This page provides metadata and source links. It does not imply possession of a full copy or permission to reproduce the work.
Sources & original material
Supreme People's Court · ZH · 2026-09-07
Related events
Supreme People's Court issues judicial opinions on AI-related disputes
The Supreme People's Court issued Fa Fa [2026] No. 10, addressing synthetic voices identifying natural persons, liability for generated infringing content, evidence for developers' non-infringement defences and protection of lawful data interests.
Related cases
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Supreme People's Court opinions on adjudicating AI-related disputes in accordance with law.” doc-0230. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.