The archive provides Chinese and English research texts. Translations may be AI-assisted and may not yet have received independent human review. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Voice performers recognise some improved consent terms but reject assuming project assignments authorise out-of-project AI training/synthetic voices, calling for separate agreements and joint regulatory action.
What changed
Union publishes declaration/name appendix distinguishing project contracts from separate AI permissions, not law or agreement entering force.
Union publication 16 June 2025, not individual signatures; PDF/list undated. Contract changes self-reported, originals/adoption/efficacy unaudited. Not a universal permanent AI ban; separate consent is required. Printed names are not verified handwritten signatures; duplicates retained, no unique-person count. No verified litigation, legislation or specific misuse; layout/audio unreviewed.2025 declaration supplements, not replaces 2024 protocol.
Editorial research question
Editorial significance: performers distinguish project performance from trainable/synthetic uses, documenting continuing consent-boundary negotiation.
This is an editorial interpretation or question, separate from factual statements.
Evidence & sources
Voice performers recognise some improved consent terms but reject assuming project assignments authorise out-of-project AI training/synthetic voices, calling for separate agreements and joint regulatory action.
SRC-1727PDF 0–39 fulltext; web 61 date
Case
Related documents
DOC-1652Voice performers’ AI declaration publicationDOC-1653To the public and concerned partiesDOC-1654Declaration printed-name appendixCite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Turkish union publishes voice-performer AI declaration.” evt-0563. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.