ANTI-AI ARCHIVE
EVENTS / EVT-0374

ADIP statement opposing proposed Article 71T

The archive provides Chinese and English research texts. Translations may be AI-assisted and may not yet have received independent human review. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.

ADIP opposes proposed Article 71T, arguing it would facilitate AI training without creators’ permission or payment; it calls for government and congressional reconsideration and participation by other creative associations.

SOURCE DOCUMENT PAGE
Opening page of the source document associated with “We reject the proposal to add Article 71T to the Intellectual Property Law”. Original page layout retained; follow the source for the full text.View full image ↗

Opening page of the source document associated with “We reject the proposal to add Article 71T to the Intellectual Property Law”. Original page layout retained; follow the source for the full text.

Image source: ADIP; rights remain with the original rights holders.

Source · We reject the proposal to add Article 71T to the Intellectual Property Law ↗
Sources read · Research in progress

What changed

ADIP opposes proposed Article 71T, arguing it would facilitate AI training without creators’ permission or payment; it calls for government and congressional reconsideration and participation by other creative associations.

RESEARCH NOTE

Statement dated 23 April 2026, Santiago; blog listing shows 8 May and detail page a relative date. First online publication and PDF upload dates are unconfirmed. Legal-effect descriptions are ADIP’s assessment of a proposal; bill text and current legislative status were not checked.

Editorial research question

Editorial interpretation: Illustrators frame their response to a proposed training exception around permission, remuneration and policy participation, rather than a blanket rejection of AI.

This is an editorial interpretation or question, separate from factual statements.

Evidence & sources

01

ADIP opposes proposed Article 71T, arguing it would facilitate AI training without creators’ permission or payment; it calls for government and congressional reconsideration and participation by other creative associations.

SRC-0445

Body lines 28–43; blog listing lines 40–48 retained as date discrepancy.

02

Official PDF also bears 23 April 2026 and expresses the same objection.

SRC-0446

Complete one-page PDF text, lines 0–21.

Case

Related documents

DOC-0436We reject the proposal to add Article 71T to the Intellectual Property LawDOC-0437We reject the proposal to add Article 71T to the Intellectual Property Law

Cite this record

ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “ADIP statement opposing proposed Article 71T.” evt-0374. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.