The archive provides Chinese and English research texts. Translations may be AI-assisted and may not yet have received independent human review. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
ADIP opposes proposed Article 71T, arguing it would facilitate AI training without creators’ permission or payment; it calls for government and congressional reconsideration and participation by other creative associations.
Statement dated 23 April 2026, Santiago; blog listing shows 8 May and detail page a relative date. First online publication and PDF upload dates are unconfirmed. Legal-effect descriptions are ADIP’s assessment of a proposal; bill text and current legislative status were not checked.
Case chronology
ADIP statement opposing proposed Article 71T
ADIP opposes proposed Article 71T, arguing it would facilitate AI training without creators’ permission or payment; it calls for government and congressional reconsideration and participation by other creative associations.
Chamber rejects Article 8 of reconstruction bill
Chile’s Chamber rejects Article 8 of bill 18216-05 at first consideration: 43 votes for,104 against and 7 abstentions.
Research question
Illustrators frame their response to a proposed training exception around permission, remuneration and policy participation, rather than a blanket rejection of AI.
Related documents
DOC-0436We reject the proposal to add Article 71T to the Intellectual Property LawDOC-0437We reject the proposal to add Article 71T to the Intellectual Property LawDOC-0438Vote details — Bill 18216-05, Article 8DOC-0439Finance ministry omits controversial provision described as infringing copyright from new amendments to major reformSources
ADIP · ES · Date unknown
ADIP · ES · Date unknown
Cámara de Diputadas y Diputados de Chile · ES · 2026-05-20
The Clinic · ES · 2026-07-10
Related cases
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Chilean ADIP: objection to proposed Article 71T.” case-0222. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.