The archive provides Chinese and English research texts. Translations may be AI-assisted and may not yet have received independent human review. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Four organisations criticise the AI chapter and call for creator review, consent, remuneration and credit.
View full image ↗Image published with “Statement by FADIP, ARTE ES ÉTICA, SEGAP-CGT and EGAIR”. Its creation date is not inferred from the event date in this record.
Image source: Arte es Ética / FADIP / SEGAP-CGT / EGAIR; rights remain with the original rights holders.
Source · Statement by FADIP, ARTE ES ÉTICA, SEGAP-CGT and EGAIR ↗What changed
Four organisations criticise the AI chapter and call for creator review, consent, remuneration and credit.
Date is the document dateline; web publication is September 25. First circulation and delivery are unknown; four named cities do not establish four physical actions.
Editorial research question
Editorial interpretation: Records creators’ objections to participation and labour framing in an industry guide.
This is an editorial interpretation or question, separate from factual statements.
Evidence & sources
Four organisations criticise the AI chapter and call for creator review, consent, remuneration and credit.
SRC-0389Lines 19–146: webpage date, introduction, full statement and its closing date.
FADIP-hosted PDF also bears the May 20, 2024 dateline.
SRC-0390Full nine-page PDF text read, lines 0–276; date on final page.
Arte es Ética / FADIP / SEGAP-CGT / EGAIR · ES · 2024-09-25
FADIP / Arte es Ética / SEGAP / EGAIR · ES · Date unknown
Case
Related documents
DOC-0377Statement by FADIP, ARTE ES ÉTICA, SEGAP-CGT and EGAIRDOC-0378Statement by FADIP, ARTE ES ÉTICA, SEGAP and EGAIRCite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Joint statement challenges the comic white paper’s AI chapter.” evt-0328. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.