The archive provides Chinese and English research texts. Translations may be AI-assisted and may not yet have received independent human review. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Research is ongoing; collected events do not constitute a complete case history.
View full image ↗Image published with “Statement by FADIP, ARTE ES ÉTICA, SEGAP-CGT and EGAIR”. Its creation date is not inferred from the event date in this record.
Image source: Arte es Ética / FADIP / SEGAP-CGT / EGAIR; rights remain with the original rights holders.
Source · Statement by FADIP, ARTE ES ÉTICA, SEGAP-CGT and EGAIR ↗FADIP’s25 September 2024 introduction retrospectively dates formation of the working group to23 January and describes analysis of chapter9.1 and advocacy for revision in a future edition. Participant account, not proof of completed revision. Linked nine-page statement is existing src-0390, signed20 May; keep publication and statement dates distinct.
Case chronology
Joint statement challenges the comic white paper’s AI chapter
Four organisations criticise the AI chapter and call for creator review, consent, remuneration and credit.
Research question
Records creators’ objections to participation and labour framing in an industry guide.
Related documents
DOC-0377Statement by FADIP, ARTE ES ÉTICA, SEGAP-CGT and EGAIRDOC-0378Statement by FADIP, ARTE ES ÉTICA, SEGAP and EGAIRDOC-0379White Paper on Comics in Spain — 9.1 The future of comics: artificial intelligence between panelsDOC-0924AI and the comics white paperSources
Arte es Ética / FADIP / SEGAP-CGT / EGAIR · ES · 2024-09-25
FADIP / Arte es Ética / SEGAP / EGAIR · ES · Date unknown
Sectorial del Cómic; copy hosted by Observatorio Extremeño de la Cultura · ES · Date unknown
Related cases
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Comic white paper: joint objection to the AI chapter.” case-0192. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.