Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Porridge.Horrendous calls for greater transparency over submission ownership, third-party content and oversight of the donation process.
What changed
Porridge.Horrendous calls for greater transparency over submission ownership, third-party content and oversight of the donation process.
A single public comment, not community consensus or established wrongdoing. Subsequent replies have not been obtained.
Editorial research question
Editorial interpretation: voluntary donation does not remove questions of attribution, reuse or provenance checks. Internal community negotiation forms part of consent mechanisms.
This is an editorial interpretation or question, separate from factual statements.
Evidence & sources
Porridge.Horrendous calls for greater transparency over submission ownership, third-party content and oversight of the donation process.
SRC-0330First post, lines 6–82: licence and submissions; 111–163: attribution-waiver discussion; 195–214: 20 July questions about ownership checks.
Krita Artists / tiar and forum participants · EN · 2024-07-12
Case
Related documents
DOC-0318Call for donation of artworks for the Fast Line Art projectCite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Community member questions donated artwork ownership checks.” evt-0291. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.