The archive provides Chinese and English research texts. Translations may be AI-assisted and may not yet have received independent human review. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Porridge.Horrendous calls for greater transparency over submission ownership, third-party content and oversight of the donation process.
View full image ↗Image published with “Call for donation of artworks for the Fast Line Art project”. Its creation date is not inferred from the event date in this record.
Image source: Krita Artists / tiar and forum participants; rights remain with the original rights holders.
Source · Call for donation of artworks for the Fast Line Art project ↗What changed
Porridge.Horrendous calls for greater transparency over submission ownership, third-party content and oversight of the donation process.
A single public comment, not community consensus or established wrongdoing. Subsequent replies have not been obtained.
Editorial research question
Editorial interpretation: voluntary donation does not remove questions of attribution, reuse or provenance checks. Internal community negotiation forms part of consent mechanisms.
This is an editorial interpretation or question, separate from factual statements.
Evidence & sources
Porridge.Horrendous calls for greater transparency over submission ownership, third-party content and oversight of the donation process.
SRC-0330First post, lines 6–82: licence and submissions; 111–163: attribution-waiver discussion; 195–214: 20 July questions about ownership checks.
Krita Artists / tiar and forum participants · EN · 2024-07-12
Case
Related documents
DOC-0318Call for donation of artworks for the Fast Line Art projectCite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Community member questions donated artwork ownership checks.” evt-0291. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.