Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Research is ongoing; collected events do not constitute a complete case history.
The start date is only the earliest event collected in this batch; it does not assert that the controversy began that day.
Case chronology
Krita roadmap proposes AI-assisted inking with data constraints
Krita reports participating artists' criticism of generative AI while exploring assistive inking, promising not to use models trained on scraped images.
Krita community calls for training-artwork donations
Tiar solicits paired sketches and line art, requires contributors to hold rights, and describes CC-BY licensing with attribution waivers under specified conditions.
Community member questions donated artwork ownership checks
Porridge.Horrendous calls for greater transparency over submission ownership, third-party content and oversight of the donation process.
Krita introduces the experimental Fast Sketch Cleanup plugin
The project describes an experimental line-art cleanup plugin available to try, stating that participants donated training data with consent for specified purposes and that processing occurs locally.
Research question
artists and developers negotiate assistance, consent to uses and data constraints. Rejection of unauthorised training is not a ban on all machine learning.
Related documents
DOC-0316What We're Up To In 2024DOC-0317Digging into the Fast Sketch Cleanup Plugin for KritaDOC-0318Call for donation of artworks for the Fast Line Art projectSources
Krita Artists / tiar and forum participants · EN · 2024-07-12
Related cases
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “Krita: rejecting scraped training data and exploring assistive inking.” case-0169. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.