Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Tamaki republished on note a platform notice they said they had received, announcing account and support termination on July 28. The author described moving to other platforms and planned to continue using AI as a tool.
What changed
Tamaki republished on note a platform notice they said they had received, announcing account and support termination on July 28. The author described moving to other platforms and planned to continue using AI as a tool.
Date of the personal account’s publication; actual July 28 enforcement was not confirmed. The creator said they were not disappointed in FANBOX and is not labeled an anti-AI activist or protester.
Editorial research question
Editorial interpretation: reads a creator-funding platform’s eligibility rules alongside affected AI creators’ migration experiences to examine relations between rules and practice.
This is an editorial interpretation or question, separate from factual statements.
Evidence & sources
Tamaki republished on note a platform notice they said they had received, announcing account and support termination on July 28. The author described moving to other platforms and planned to continue using AI as a tool.
SRC-0197Lines 13–51: date and republished suspension notice; lines 63–74 and 90–96: platform migration and continued AI use.
Tamaki (One Who Speaks to AI) / note · JA · 2023-07-26
Case
Related documents
DOC-0185This account will be closed (reposted from FANBOX)Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “AI creator publishes reported FANBOX suspension notice and describes migration.” evt-0201. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.