Chinese and English archive texts include AI-assisted translations, not independently human-reviewed. Consult the original-language sources alongside them.
Research is ongoing; collected events do not constitute a complete case history.
The start date is only the earliest event collected in this batch; it does not assert that the controversy began that day.
Case chronology
FANBOX help page marks update to AI-content definition and enforcement guidance
The official help page defines content whose main production elements are AI-generated and lists exceptions such as assisted coloring, automated translation, and technical explanations. Violating posts and external referrals intended to distribute such content may be restricted.
AI creator publishes reported FANBOX suspension notice and describes migration
Tamaki republished on note a platform notice they said they had received, announcing account and support termination on July 28. The author described moving to other platforms and planned to continue using AI as a tool.
Research question
Reads a creator-funding platform’s eligibility rules alongside affected AI creators’ migration experiences to examine relations between rules and practice.
Related documents
DOC-0184What is “AI-generated content”?DOC-0185This account will be closed (reposted from FANBOX)Sources
Tamaki (One Who Speaks to AI) / note · JA · 2023-07-26
Cite this record
ANTI-AI ARCHIVE. “pixivFANBOX / AI-generated-content rules and creator suspension notice.” case-0121. Include this page’s URL and your access date when citing.